So what I’ve collected about the differences between popular sources and scholarly sources is the actual context of the source, which I believe is whether or not there are reporters or actual chemical evidence of contaminated water. I feel like a popular source can be authoritative if there are multiple sources, including an investigation. And the biggest questions to ask is how reliable is the source, is it a ‘.com’, ‘.org’, or a .gov’, does it have a bibliography with different references?
I’ve found another source that I believe is a scholarly source which actually questions the chemical property within New York water and discusses how Long Island has the most contaminated water in the state. This source has numerous footnotes that relate back to other sources that have evidence of nineteen different emerging contaminants were detected in Long Island, and that Nassau County has the highest number of water systems that have detections of contaminated water. The most prominent contaminant is strontium, which I’ve found in a different article from the American Bone Health that ingesting high amounts of strontium can have dangerous side effects. It can cause, to name just a few, liver inflammation and disturbances in thinking. And to think that Long Island’s water system has a high amount of strontium is worrying, especially since Nassau County borders many cities in Queens, NY.


